Wikipedia:Cleanup

Wishlists

Vandalism

Quality assurance

Text modules

  • Redundancy
  • Quality assurance
  • Candidates for Deletion
  • Delete rules
  • Reviews
  • 3.1 Category set
  • 3.2 Subject-specific quality assurance?
  • 3.3 Submit an Article
  • Fixed 3.4 defects?

Objective

  • April 9, 2014
  • April 8, 2014
  • April 7, 2014
  • April 6, 2014
  • April 5, 2014
  • April 4, 2014
  • April 3, 2014

Old quality assurance side of 2013!:

  • August 22, 2013

There staff are always needed, the process the quality assurance Pages:

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2

Random QS case • Archives

Enter a new candidate

Generally

In quality assurance, articles and sections are to be revised, which do not meet the formal requirements for good articles in important passages. This is especially true for new products that have been created by inexperienced writers; but it may also be reported already longer existing articles.

  • Check us prior to registration, if you can not improve itself by a brief search the error.
  • If it is specific shortcomings, the setting of a concrete maintenance block offers.

Quality assurance instead of deleting application

Here registered products can nevertheless be proposed for speedy deletion, if criticisms are clearly not fix it, or be entered in the deletion candidate, if the relevance is probably not given or the substantive shortcomings are too serious.

What quality assurance is not there

  • Quality assurance is not relevant testing. If you have any doubts about the relevance of an article, please check yourself briefly the relevance criteria and make, if necessary, then a deletion request.
  • Quality assurance is not omniscient oracle. Product creators are encouraged to provide the contents of its text material itself with reputablen documents. Remove possibly dubious and blank passages or use the block " evidence is lacking " (each with a meaningful explanation on the talk page ).
  • Quality assurance is no item request concert. New articles should demonstrate a minimum level of content, substance; only then the QA staff are able to at least make a valid stub it. Relevant articles in which the expansion of specific facts or sections is desired, are to be provided with the block " patchy ".

Some basic points are:

  • Improve the formatting of the article
  • Provided the article to a reasonable extent with internal links
  • Adjust the item to the styles
  • Sort the items in the appropriate categories
  • Improve the linguistic style of the articles, they make particular course
  • Formulate tendentious article neutral
  • Examine particular new articles on a possible copyright infringement toward

Procedure

Category set

Before you enter a product to quality assurance, check if at least one content appropriate category is set. If this is the case, possibly existing subject gateways using bots to be informed of the required QA. Attempts therefore, if no category is set to provide the article with at least one gross or generally applicable category. A more detailed classification can then take over authors in the business portals and editorial offices.

Subject-specific quality assurance?

Submit an Article

  • After saving the full quality assurance component appears earlier in the article. Now follow the link to the current quality assurance page and list the items on there. Explain there again, why have you entered the article here; you to easily copy your text justification from the block and insert at this point. Think of the signature.

Fixed defects?

If you're of the opinion that the shortcomings of the article have been corrected, you can remove the QA module from the article. Write in the summary row "QS finished " or " QS". This step is shared is easily recognizable in the page history.

Write possibly make one final comment on the associated QA discussion on this article, and last { { done | ~ ~ ~ ~ }}. The entire section is automatically archived after some time.

If you have submitted an deletion request for the article, the article in the QA discussion characterizing please { { done | LA ~ ~ ~ ~ }} as.

819931
de