Wikipedia:Requests for adminship

  • Opinion of images
  • Surveys
  • Nominations Admin candidacies
  • Bureaucrats - candidacies
  • Oversight Nominations
  • Check user selection
  • Arbitration either

The participation at the polls is only possible for general voting user. An overview of past nominations can be found in the archive vote.

Admin candidacies

  • Rights logbook
  • Last Voters

Guidelines for Nominations Admin

  • Each general voting member may nominate themselves or other voting member. Please note against a proposal these notes and seek the approval of the candidate. Join the discussion about candidates can and should be open to all users.
  • Insert new suggestions please the introduction, as a "template " select one of the preceding sections, possibly from the archive. Please analog candidate in the template Participate enter.
  • Each voting member may vote only with a pro-or contra - vote or abstain, abstentions are not considered in the evaluation. Give your vote in the appropriate section from and signed with - ~ ~ ~ ~. For longer reasons (more than one paragraph) used please, to maintain clarity, the talk page.
  • Votes should not be commented on the voting page by other users. This can be done on the talk page.
  • In order for a candidate can be appointed administrator, shall within two weeks at least 50 users have voted with Pro, at least two thirds of the votes cast shall be per - vote. Abstentions do not count as votes cast.
  • The bureaucrats implement the outcome of the vote, however, have a margin of discretion in determining whether the conditions for the candidates and the voters are satisfied.
  • These guidelines shall apply mutatis mutandis in case of candidates for bureaucrats Oversighters and check user authorized, ie functions that are based technically on admin rights.

Coyote III

→ Check the right to vote at this election

  • User page (Talk • Contributions • Email • logs • block log • voting rights • Post Count • Meta - rights log • Group membership • View user rights change)

The admin task appeals to me as a new challenge, and I think that other Admins are definitely still needed; it is certainly good to distribute this not always an easy task on enough shoulders. It consists yes to one of the well-known " service activities", which I would probably then begin if I am elected by you; on deletion discussions I was, if not constantly, every now and again active, especially on the QS and in the care of mentees, and on WP: VM I read along in the past from time to time for some time, so I as a distinct idea have, how it happens and what properties should have an admin if he wants to be useful as active.

I think I 'm a total a thoughtful and objective person who is trying to talk (in this case writing) to come to a common solution; I also think that I can bear conflicts and the sometimes occurring hardness. In addition to all communication, it is in the admin function but also possibly necessary to find clear words and decisions. Even for that I am ready and see myself capable of.

Best regards, - Coyote III (talk) 08:24, March 29 2014 ( CET )

Pro Coyote III

Contra III Coyote

Abstentions Coyote III

Comments Coyote III

For comments on the candidacy, please use the talk page.

Candidates for automatic Deadministrierung

The following administrators were made ​​aware that their withdrawal from Admin rights of inactivity before is due to the opinion of the image, since they were almost a year inactive and their Admin rights are no longer used (cf. Statistics). The Admin rights are withdrawn 90 days after notification, if no traceable action ( Edit or logbook entry ) is done.

819935
de