Psiram

Technical aspects and structure

Contents and reception

Since 2007 is alerted to the appropriate web sites anonymously in front of para-scientific method and people. Michael Uch of the Protestant Association for ideological matters stand beside differentiated information permanently and violent excesses and polemics and criticized a lack of transparency. Critics of Esowatch used temporarily at the same time almost identical denominated domains to guide users deliberately misleading.

Marcus Anhäuser arranged EsoWatch 2009 on Spiegel Online of the skeptics movement. 2010 Esowatch was introduced in the computer magazine c't under the heading sites currently. Accordingly, Esowatch dedicate the fight against superstition, quackery and pseudoscience, and the entries in this glossary are extensively provided with sources and found a " treasure trove of scientifically tenable arguments " Represents the online magazine Telepolis reported since 2008 several times over activities of Psiram.

The Psycho- oncologist Volker Tschuschke counts the page to " skeptical to be considered [n ] Board ." He criticized at Psiram represented perspectives on so-called " cancer personality" and a derived wholesale rejection of the assumption of a personality -related cancer risk.