Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion

  • Redundancy
  • Quality assurance
  • Candidates for Deletion
  • Delete rules Quick deletion request Current candidates

As Fast Erase is called to delete a page without the prior seven-day deletion discussion. The Fast Erase is designed for clear-cut cases that do not need to be thrashed out. The exact requirements are specified in the following Quick deletion criteria.

  • 3.1 Article
  • 3.2 Article discussion pages
  • 3.3 files
  • 3.4 Other
  • Provide 4.1 Application
  • 4.2 The way forward

Criteria for speedy deletion

Article deletions

  • Basic defects in articles:
  • Joke items and fakes: Where there is doubt whether an article is really a joke, but should always be a normal deletion request will be made ​​.
  • Unambiguous irrelevance: The lemma is shown unequivocally not relevant ( small clubs, totally unknown people). In dubious relevance a normal deletion request is always set to. The fact that the relevance of the lemma is not shown in the article, is not a quick- erase surface. Also, there is no unequivocal irrelevance if facts are not used, explain the relevance of policy.
  • Void: Pages that consist of clearly illegal content, such as insults, hate speech, obvious violation of personal rights and defamatory content, the latter should be reported to a " Oversights " then.
  • Obvious Advertising: Texts that represent clearly and primarily an advertisement for a company or a specific product and do not contain encyclopaedic recyclable content.
  • Copyright ( URV ) combined with the lack of quality: When a " unique " Copyright infringement is detected and the text only with great effort could reach an encyclopedic quality - to in this case, please make an { { URV }} message to the support team relieve.

Metabegründungen

  • Redundancy: Article, the content is already fully contained in another article, but only if the lemma is not worth preserving as forwarding.
  • Revenants: A re-deployed copy of an article that was deleted after a regular deletion discussion. Inasmuch as the deletion due to lack of relevance of the studies, and content differing from the original text articles can be quickly erased as revenants. The about crucial Admin in this case checks whether the relevance is represented by new, previously unknown facts in the new article or whether the interpretation of the question of relevance has changed in the meantime. If in doubt, a regular deletion request should always be made.

File deletions

  • A file ( image, audio or video files) that a " true copy " (duplicate ) - please prefer higher resolution - is another. However, make sure beforehand that no article uses the file to delete and replace the file uses!
  • A file that there are now in better quality ( for example, a logo in JPG format, which is now a PNG or SVG). In the quick deletion request always please a link to the better file to add in order to facilitate a speedy execution.
  • An image that clearly constitutes copyright infringement and in which no release is expected.
  • A file that has stood for over two weeks in the file verification, without the required information has been grudge. A duly motivated SLA is provided by an employee of the DÜP.
  • A file to be adopted by that is that it could serve no encyclopedic purpose and is not used. ( Examples are: Logos of obviously irrelevant bands or companies, and graphics in obviously poor quality, where the use is excluded).

Other deletion reasons

  • Unwanted redirects: Especially for rare misspellings, talk pages and redirects from the article namespace in the editorial area (see Help: Namespaces # rules). You should check that there are no links from the article namespace point to the to be deleted forwarding and no relevant for an existing item version history exists. However, it is not always sensible to resolve links to redirects.
  • Pages in the user namespace: Upon request of the user ( newly created by others pages in the user's personal space ) or because they violate the rules for user pages. User talk pages are not deleted by user request.
  • Talk pages of IP users: The are no longer relevant (not with static IP).
  • Categories: They were moved by bot on a different name.
  • Talk pages: The only foul discussions included. Is it likely that the subject of repeated discussions promotes that do not comply with the rules may be the template: Insert discussion page. Is the belonging to the talk page article does not exist ( or already before creating only access), the talk page should be protected from creation.
  • Name changes: If the name of an item had changed for some reason and a redirect to the new name blocked the move.

Neuautorenbeiträge

No case for a rapid deletion

Article

Article talk pages

  • Talk pages of articles: These should not be deleted, but if necessary archived. Under certain circumstances, however, is the deletion of individual passages or the emptying of page useful, see Cleaning up talk pages.

Files

Others

Method

Make application

Before a quick deletion request:

For a quick deletion request you add the following at the beginning of the article:

{ { Delete | reason = 1 - ~ ~ ~ ~ } } or { {delete | reason = 1 - ~ ~ ~ ~ } } or { { sla | 1 = write reason - ~ ~ ~ ~ }}

Means ---- ( four dashes ) at the beginning of the following line can be the application with a solid line separate from the article text. Especially with appeals and subsequent short discussion, it is recommended for a better overview, introduction of such a dividing line.

What to do next

Using the quick deletion decides an administrator. Appeals can be written under the application. An administrator has the quick erase justification and, if appropriate, examine the objection carefully; for examination include history and talk page. Should the appeal be duly substantiated or not apply the above criteria, the request is converted into a delete request or completely rejected. Otherwise, the administrator performs the deletion. After the deletion and the reasons for non-administrators only in the deletion log can be viewed.

  • Caveat: Even after the deletion of an objection to the quick deletion is possible; this is first to be noted on the talk page of deleted administrator. Where a user object to the deletion, the article is either restore, against deletion, application module and perform a proper deletion discussion, or it is the administrator to specify a corresponding statement of reasons which will become apparent, is why the appeal is not upheld. In the latter case, a recovery request is registered on the page erase verify.
  • Protection: Indicates that a lemma has already been quickly erased multiple times and a useful item is not to be expected, a side protection of the title against new installation is recommended.
820032
de