Wikipedia:Peer review
- Redundancy
- Quality assurance
- Candidates for Deletion
- Delete rules
- Reviews Review Humanities and Social Science
- Earth Sciences
- History
- Science and Technology
- Sports
- Traffic
- Lists and portals
Products should only be set if the authors involved are no longer able to see, to improve the text alone. Therefore, please check before you set an item in the review whether it is basic requirements. Some typical errors you can fix using the Autoreviewers. In the Policies pane, you can find further guidance, for example, advice on writing style and recommendations on the appearance of an article.
After a successful review process, the article may run for an award. Products are removed from the review if they either run for the excellent article worth reading, or if it is obviously no longer working on them (interpretation of the Directive: 14 days since the last discussion entry ), or if they do not meet the above conditions. At the latest after about six to eight weeks of the review process should be completed. The reviews please cut and paste on the talk pages of the articles archive.
The review process is based on reciprocity: If you set items here, take your time and in return help others with objective criticism according to the critique etiquette.
Setting item in the review:
- Fill in the right bottom is a heading on the pattern [ [ XYZ article] ] with your signature and a comment. There, then the discussion takes place. Write a short comment what you've already done on the article, why you no longer see yourself in the position to him continue to improve itself, and possibly a short or medium-term objective ( worth reading / excellent), and - if available - own, so far unrealized proposals.
- Signing the article at the end of the text block { { Review | X} }. Set X for the first letter of the Review section in question:
The Review of the day calls daily articles that are to be revised to make. Marked in bold articles were already once "Review of the Day". Submit request for new review of the day.
The term refers to a hypothetical ethereal form of matter that is to be finer and more mobile than the gross matter of which made the visible body. The postulated fines is thus between matter and the immaterial and is used in some philosophical approaches to the explanation of an interaction between two elements or to explain intangible phenomena at all. Such ideas are found in some ancient philosophers, particularly in Platonism and partly in his influence, partly independent of, and in some texts from the culture area of the three monotheistic religions such as, among others, in Gnosticism and Hermeticism, besides also in Eastern religions especially in Hinduism. Even in the natural religions of Polynesia existed similar ideas.
Humanities and Social Science
James Bond 007: Skyfall • Conflict Studies • Alice Munro • Climate of Fear • The bear climbed over the mountain • Research Question • The man who invented the sin • People picture • Anselm Kiefer • Hans Martin Suter Master • Moral relativism • Women in Science • President Chile • Design • teaching young, brutal, handsome 2 • Romy Schneider • Pierce the Veil • John William Burgon • advertising and sponsorship in German schools • the Secrets of Nicholas Flamel • University of Wuppertal • Theodor W. Adorno • Klaus Ampler • Seoul National University • Ethereal World • Einar Schleef • Just Cause 2
Science and Technology
History of Linux • Intelligence • Pronghorn • Brown • Green Zärtling water in space
Earth Sciences
Buchenau ( Dautphetal)
Traffic
Berlin Transport • Pfälzischer MBCC • • Kuckucksbähnel railway Landau -Rohrbach • railway line Mannheim -Saarbrücken • Ilm- Rennsteig Cycle Path
History
Saigerhütte Grünthal • Margarete Himmler • Economic history of Chile • Cripps Pink • Castle Ruins • Good stone Lopodunum • Operation Tiger Fish • Pre-Columbian Art • Gerd Althoff • Percy Ernst Schramm • Riepenburg
Sports
Speed Skating World Cup in Berlin • Thomas Köhler ( luger ) • E- Sports • Cyril Dessel
Lists and portals
Portal: West Middle Franconia
Rated Articles in QS: College of St. Blaise (QA 20.3. ) · Big Bang (physics) · celiac disease (medicine) Review without discussion entry: Cripps Pink ( RVG) • Research question (RVS ) • Klaus Ampler (RVS )