Wikipedia:Trust network

How does the web of trust?

Who wants to join in, puts a page: On [ [User Name / trust ] ]. On this he can integrate to initiate the text block { { Web of Trust }} or write your own introduction. The people he trusts - which claims they are put in this term must each define yourself - it lists on this page in form: [ [ User: Username / trust ] ]. Some people add one more " personal" when they know someone from the real life. It is quite helpful if you state why you trust someone (for example, because you personally, that is, in real life, hit him, or because you have followed the articles that someone has written ).

Examples:

• [ [ User: Benutzername1/Vertrauen ] ] ( I think is very knowledgeable in the field of history, transport)
• [ [ User: Benutzername2/Vertrauen ] ] ( personal)

Link to an overview of what people trust you, you bind like this:

[ [ Special: WhatLinksHere / User: Name / trust | This user trust me ] ] One thing you need to use your own username instead of name.

Recommendations for the use

Some users are the Web of Trust skeptical and do not want to not be so brought in a positive way to communicate, also applies to the decision of the tribunal: " The mention of or linking users on user pages against their will (...) is not the guidelines for the user namespace compatible. " It follows that you have a user who expresses the will, in general or of you not to be performed on a list, take of your trust list.

Please always remember: Even if you are not on a list, that does not mean that you can not trust you. These lists must be maintained by hand, and it has not at any time on a daily basis.

Distrust

Following the same principle, had earlier also express distrust by the list of links in the form: put [ [User Username / distrust .]] The problem was to censure lists that they interfered with the effect of amplifying the good and unnecessarily polarized.

Following a decision of the arbitral tribunal distrust lists violate the guidelines for the user name space and are therefore to be treated as any other unwanted content.

This also includes the trust lists hidden ratings or weightings of the spoken confidence. Following the decision of the Arbitration Court of the 'Classification of trust lists based on subjective ratings [ ... ] is not compatible with the concept of the trust network and the guidelines for the user name space " is.